WHAT AND WHERE IS HEAVEN?

Does heaven exist? With well over 100,000 plus recorded and described spiritual experiences collected over 15 years, to base the answer on, science can now categorically say yes. Furthermore, you can see the evidence for free on the website allaboutheaven.org.

Available on Amazon
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B086J9VKZD
also on all local Amazon sites, just change .com for the local version (.co.uk, .jp, .nl, .de, .fr etc.)

VISIONS AND HALLUCINATIONS

This book, which covers Visions and hallucinations, explains what causes them and summarises how many hallucinations have been caused by each event or activity. It also provides specific help with questions people have asked us, such as ‘Is my medication giving me hallucinations?’.

Available on Amazon
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B088GP64MW 
also on all local Amazon sites, just change .com for the local version (.co.uk, .jp, .nl, .de, .fr etc.)


Observations placeholder

PubMed - Thoracic epidural analgesia or intravenous morphine analgesia after thoracoabdominal esophagectomy

Identifier

012014

Type of Spiritual Experience

Hallucination

Number of hallucinations: 35

Background

A description of the experience

J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2005 Jun;19(3):350-7.  Thoracic epidural analgesia or intravenous morphine analgesia after thoracoabdominal esophagectomy: a prospective follow-up of 201 patients.  Rudin A1, Flisberg P, Johansson J, Walther B, Lundberg CJ.  1Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Lund University Hospital, Sweden. asa.rudin@skane.se

OBJECTIVE:  Thoracoabdominal esophagectomy is a major surgical procedure that carries significant postoperative morbidity and mortality. Because the choice of analgesic technique may influence outcome, the impact of thoracic epidural or intravenous analgesia was investigated after esophagectomy.

DESIGN:  Prospective observational study during January 1996 until January 2002.

SETTING:  University hospital.

PARTICIPANTS:  All patients undergoing thoracoabdominal esophagectomy during the 6-year period.

INTERVENTIONS:  Patients were prospectively monitored during a 6-year period. Duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, fluid administration, postoperative intubation time, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, pain relief and related side effects, postoperative complications, hospital stay, and in-hospital and long-term mortality were compared in relation with the analgesic technique.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULT:  Thoracic epidural analgesia with bupivacaine/morphine was used in 166 patients, and intravenous morphine analgesia was used in 35 patients. Postoperative intubation time and ICU stay were similar in both groups.

  • Patients with epidural analgesia experienced less pain.
  • Sedation, respiratory depression, hallucinations, and confusion were more common in the intravenous morphine group.

Postoperative weight did not differ between the groups, despite fluid replacement that was higher in the epidural group during the first 24 hours. The in-hospital mortality rate was 0.5%.

CONCLUSIONS:  No differences in morbidity/mortality rates depending on analgesic treatment were observed in patients undergoing thoracoabdominal esophagectomy. Thoracic epidural analgesia provided better pain relief with fewer opioid-related side effects than intravenous morphine analgesia. However, postoperative epidural analgesia was associated with more technical difficulties.

PMID: 16130063

The source of the experience

PubMed

Concepts, symbols and science items

Concepts

Symbols

Science Items

Activities and commonsteps

Activities

Overloads

Cancer
Morphine
Mouth and tooth disease

Commonsteps

References